Commercial media. What is it? What does it do? Who uses it?
All these questions were answered in lecture 6, with the topic being commercial
media and a specific look at it in Australia. Commercial media encompasses television,
newspapers, magazines and radio. It can also include telecommunications
companies, such as Telstra and Optus. Some examples of the commercial media in
Australia today are channels 7, 9 and ten, companies such as News Limited and
Fairfax, and radio producers like Austereo. The purpose of commercial media is
to ‘sell audiences to advertisers’. This is to say, every time you sit down to
watch a show on your favourite commercial station, you are in fact wanted there
to view the advertisements, rather than the programs themselves. Commercial
media is a form of profit driven media production, which requires audiences in
order to attract advertisers and generate profit. That said, commercial media
outlets still attempt to gain the trust of the audience. Media has a
responsibility in a democracy, as well as having to meet formal state
requirements, such as legal prescriptions and statutory boards. The lecture
also made mention of a public sphere, which is space between commerce and government
where people can debate freely and form public opinion (for a more in depth
look at this concept, and others associated with commercial media: http://world-information.org/wio/infostructure/100437611795/100438659076).
There are also new controls on commercial media, such as government agencies
regulating content, state press subsidies and licensed journalism in nations
such as Indonesia and East Timor. Some believe that commercial media is corrupt
and lacks quality (John McManus – Market Driven Journalism 1994) and that ‘In
this regard, one thing stands out above all others –the view that the very
nature of the commercial equates to a corruption of the social. In other words,
as media become more commercial, they do so at the expense of their social
function. This is seen as a zerosum game. Profits come before quality’ (Prof.
Michael Bromley – SJC 2009). This is an
interesting concept, and I have to say, that to a certain extent, I agree with
the aforementioned opinions. To be honest, I was unaware that the majority of
media I consumed was considered commercial, and that the main drive behind
these entities was profit. So are their claims of commitment to delivering
quality content or local productions merely a strategy on their behalf to
attract a wide, previously elusive audience, to advertisers? I believe that
this is probably the case, however I do also believe that commercial media is
not necessarily bad. At the end of the day, these media outlets are businesses,
and the goal of business is to make money. So no, I will not stop watching,
reading, or buying things produced by these commercial media bodies, but I will
view them differently, with the knowledge that for the big players, the news isn’t
always about the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment